<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>AnimalRights.Net - American Anti-Vivisection Society</title>		<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/related_topics/Organizations/pro_ar/american_anti_vivisection_society.html</link>		<description>Articles about American Anti-Vivisection Society</description>		<language>en</language>		<copyright>Copyright 2007 brian@carnell.com</copyright>		<category>American Anti-Vivisection Society</category>		<item>	<title>More Animal Rights Reactions to Dog Cloning</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2005/000330.html</link>	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2005/000330.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=83596</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><!--weblog.item.channels: Can't evaluate the expression because the name '354' hasn't been defined.-->	<description>Neal Barnard says dog cloning is pointless -- just look at Vioxx!</description>	</item><item>	<title>USDA Rejects Call to Regulate Pet Cloning</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2005/000265.html</link>	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2005/000265.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=83173</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><category>Miscellaneous</category><category>American Anti-Vivisection Society</category><category>Genetic Savings &amp; Clone</category><category>Cloning</category><category>Pets</category>	<description>USDA says that since Genetic Saving &amp; Clone only deals with embyros, it cannot be regulated </description>	</item><item>	<title>California Activist Groups Form State Association</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2005/000035.html</link>	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2005/000035.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=80448</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><!--weblog.item.channels: Can't evaluate the expression because the name '349' hasn't been defined.-->	<description>Group will lobby California legislature on bills relating to animals.</description>	</item><item>	<title>University of Texas at Austin Disclaims Beagle Patent</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2004/000269.html</link>	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2004/000269.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=74391</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><category>Dogs</category><category>American Anti-Vivisection Society</category><category>Sue Leary</category><category>United States</category><category>Texas</category>	<description>University gives up patent that had been challenged as being neither novel nor original.</description>	</item><item>	<title>American Anti-Vivisection Society Demands Immediate Halt to Xeno Research</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2004/000126.html</link>	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2004/000126.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=71610</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><category>Pigs</category><category>American Anti-Vivisection Society</category><category>Tina Nelson</category><category>Xenotransplantation</category>	<description>Stop that research now before anyone learns anything useful!</description>	</item><item>	<title>EPA Gets Partial Win in PETA/PCRM Lawsuit</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2003/000427.html</link>	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2003/000427.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=62928</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><category>Alternatives Research and Development Foundation</category><category>American Anti-Vivisection Society</category><category>People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals</category><category>Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine</category>	<description>Federal judge dismisses major part of lawsuit, but allows remaining claims against EPA to go to trial.</description>	</item><item>	<title>Animal Rights Groups Sue EPA Over Animal Testing</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2002/000307.html</link>	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 02:23:11 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2002/000307.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=45901</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><category>Alternatives Research and Development Foundation</category><category>American Anti-Vivisection Society</category><category>People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals</category><category>Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine</category>	<description>But lawsuit is more about getting headlines and news coverage than a serious attempt to overturn EPA's testing program.</description>	</item><item>	<title>In Defense of Animals/Fund for Animals Claim Victory that Wasn't</title>	<link>http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2002/000153.html</link>	<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 17:42:03 GMT</pubDate>	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2002/000153.html</guid>	<comments>http://www.animalrights.net/discussion/fullthread$msgnum=41846</comments><category>Animal Rights</category><category>Mice</category><category>American Anti-Vivisection Society</category><category>Fund for Animals</category><category>In Defense of Animals</category><category>Michael Markarian</category><category>Animal Alternatives</category><category>Medical Research</category>	<description>IDA features a page on its website giving the animal rights movement credit for the National Institutes of Health's 1999 banning of mouse production of monoclonal antibodies. The only problem is the NIH never banned mouse production of the antibodies.</description>	</item>	</channel></rss>